Source: www.roguegovernment.com
By - Lee Rogers
Alex Jones has again sunk to a new low proving once again that he is only concerned with obtaining as many Federal Reserve Notes as possible instead of reaching more and more people with information. According to Chris Arnold the owner/operator of InfoWarsTV.Com, Alex’s wife has filed legal action against him claiming that he is representing himself as being associated with Alex Jones. Jones would also confirm that this was the case when questioned about the situation on his radio show. The video of this can be viewed below. Arnold was a former moderator of the Prison Planet forums and a huge supporter of Jones prior to the lawsuit. Arnold had setup InfoWarsTV.Com as an uncensored patriot/truth alternative to mainstream video sharing web sites like YouTube, an effort that one would think that Jones would be supportive of. After all, the site would essentially be a vehicle to advertise his videos and content for free. Arnold had even placed disclaimers on his web site stating that his operation was in no way associated with Jones, but apparently that wasn’t enough for the money grubbing Federal Reserve Note worshiper.
It is funny how a man who raised over $300,000 from his June money bomb operation and supposedly auctioned off a non-functional bullhorn with his signature on it which sold for around $50,000 is so concerned about a smaller web site that appears to have been setup with the best of intentions. After all, the web site operator was a huge supporter of Jones.
According to Arnold and the material he posted on InfoWarsTV.Com he was actually threatened with a copyright violation due to the fact that Alex Jones material was posted on his web site. He was also accused of profiting off of Alex Jones material by selling advertising on his site. With that logic, Jones should sue Google/YouTube because they generate profits off of advertisements that appear on pages with his material that he doesn’t get a cut off of. All of this is hilarious because Jones has consistently said on his radio show that it is OK to spread his films and material all over the Internet.
Of course Jones has threatened to sue countless people that are involved in the alternative media. For Jones, this is about establishing an information dictatorship that has one goal and that goal focuses entirely around money. Jones has also been widely accused of playing a role in last year's downfall of We The People Radio Network another freedom oriented radio network by pressuring Wes Perkins to bring down the operation. Perkins performed contracting work for Jones but also ran the technical back-end of WTPRN. Perkins was also responsible for temporarily bringing down the Republic Broadcasting Network a few years prior when he did work for them as well. Funny how the one guy that was primarily responsible for sabotaging two freedom oriented networks would have a close association with Jones.
Jones also has regular guests that he sells as being credible that either have had ties to the intelligence community, the Jesuits, the Council for National Policy or the Vatican. In fact, when confronted about the Council for National Policy information on his show by callers, Jones always backtracks and refuses to confront the issue head on. It is because of this and other reasons as to why I came out and encouraged people to boycott his recent money bomb.
Either way, his show has become a circus with his web sites containing red alert fear mongering and stories about how Miley Cyrus asked about his web site. He also recently brought on two of today's most hated reality TV stars Heidi Montag and Spencer Pratt on his radio show in what appeared to be a conveniently staged spectacle. Associating anti New World Order information with hated reality TV stars serves to discredit the information which appears to have been the goal of bringing them on his radio show. It also serves as a convenient alternative media distraction much like how the corporate media is running non-stop coverage on Michael Jackson's death.
We will continue to speak out against Jones if he continues to engage in this type of hypocritical behavior. If Jones is really a Christian why is he so concerned with money? Maybe it is because he’s a phony Christian who worships money like it is his god. Of course, Jones yet again is playing the victim role with this legal action when he is actually the cause of most of the dissention and division in the alternative research community. This type of insanity doesn’t seem to follow David Icke, Michael Tsarion, Jim Marrs or other prominent alternative researchers, film makers and radio hosts. This type of madness only seems to follow Jones, and people should ask themselves why that is.
