Update: Ken Hajjar is actually the name of the felon that works for LHS Associates. The article has been updated accordingly.

The New Hampshire voting results should not be considered credible in either the Republican or Democrat races. There is a great deal of circumstantial and hard evidence indicating vote fraud. The most glaring is the fact that 31 votes for Ron Paul were not counted in Sutton, NH. This was confirmed by vote fraud expert Bev Harris who contacted the head clerk of the town who admitted that this was the case of human error. It is difficult to believe that 31 votes could not be counted when the only job of the people counting the votes is to count the votes. The question is, where else did something like this take place? Beyond that, the vast majority of the state made use of Diebold voting machines that are easily hacked and have a number of proven security issues. Even worse than that, is the fact that a all of the Diebold machines have been programmed by one company called LHS Associates with a suspect background. In fact, Ken Hajjar a key employee of LHS Associates has been confirmed by Bev Harris to have had a jaded past of selling drugs and election complaints. The results that came in last night actually looked like they came in from a programmed algorithm instead of actual real votes. The results didn’t even match up with polling data that indicated Barack Obama taking the state by 10% and Ron Paul polling in the teens. This election is a farce, and a recount should be conducted immediately.

Let’s look at the two winners. McCain has stated that he wouldn’t mind if America is in Iraq for 100 years and Clinton voted for the Iraq war and has spewed the same rhetoric that George W. Bush has used in his Iran war mongering. New Hampshire voted overwhelmingly for Democrats in the hope that they would end the Iraq war. It doesn’t make sense that Clinton and McCain two of the most pro-war establishment candidates in each of their respective political parties won. It also doesn’t make sense that the most anti-war candidates like Dennis Kucinich, Mike Gravel and Ron Paul didn’t do much better than the results indicated.

Obama was ahead of Clinton by margins of 10% and in some cases even higher in polls a few days prior to the New Hampshire primary. It does not make sense that Clinton was able to overcome such an overwhelming margin in such a short amount of time. The incident of her crying was a carefully timed and staged event by Clinton as an excuse the media could use to justify the implausible comeback. The media is going into overdrive with how that event helped her identify with the voters. Of course Clinton is the same person that adopts phony accents when addressing southern audiences so this whole crying incident is a farce.

There have also been polls commissioned indicating that over 30% of Republicans are against the Iraq war. With this in mind, Dr. Paul should have received the vast majority of Republicans against the war since he’s the only Republican candidate against it. Dr. Paul was also up to 14% in some establishment polls which were skewed against him in the first place. There was even a poll conducted by the Federal Forecast that indicated victories for Obama and Paul and a poor turnout for Clinton. New Hampshire is also a state with many Libertarians and independent voters so if there was a state that Dr. Paul would have done well in, it would have been this one.

Not only that, but the disparity between the votes cast for Giuliani and Dr. Paul kept increasing by around 100 votes for Giuliani over Dr. Paul each time the vote results were updated towards the end of the night. First it was an increase of 10 early in the night and then as the night went on it was an increase of 100. It looked more like a programmed algorithm manufacturing the votes than actual totals coming in.

There are also reports of election observers for the Obama and Paul campaigns being kicked out and not allowed to view the election process. This was reported by the Boston Globe. The two campaigns that have been the primary victims of vote fraud had their observers kicked out. What are the chances of this happening?

The U.S. electoral process appears to be entirely co-opted. The media presents a reality with rigged polls and focus groups which are used to convince people that the rigged results are actually what happened. We cannot trust any of these electronic voting machines and we need to go back to a paper ballot 100% across the board.