ALTERNATIVE NEWS

Blacklisted News
Cryptogon
Raw Story
Rense


TALK RADIO

Axiom Radio
Mike Chambers Live
Oracle Broadcasting
The Global Reality
Vantage Point Radio
Become Vocal Local


BLOGS

Freeman
The Celtic Rebel
Techno Fascism Blog
Washingtons's Blog


Business/Economics

321 Gold
JSMineset
Kitco
Seeking Alpha
Market Watch
Bloomberg
Wall Street Journal
RTT News
CNN Money
Forbes
Business Week
Shadow Stats
Economist
Financial Times
Fortune Magazine
Kitco
Gold Eagle
Zero Hedge
The Daily Reckoning


Science/Technology

Wired
Blast Magazine
PHYSorg
Science Daily
Popular Science
Engadget
New Scientist
Technovelgy
Singularity Hub
H+ Magazine
Science Magazine
Seed Magazine
CBR Online
Science News
SlashDot
Scientific American
Spectrum IEEE
Technology Review
io9
ZD Net
Technology News
The Register
Tech News World
VNU Net

LEE'S PODCAST/ARCHIVE

SUBSCRIBE TO RSS

FOLLOW ME ON TWITTER

LEE'S MYSPACE PAGE










  Next

Anti-Terror Laws Used To Spy On Family
Published on 04-11-2008   Email To Friend    Print Version

AddThis Social Bookmark Button

Source: London Independent

A family who were wrongly suspected of lying on a school application form have discovered that their local council used anti-terrorism surveillance powers to spy on them.

The family, from Poole in Dorset, said they had been tailed for three weeks by council officials trying to establish whether they had given a false address in an attempt to get their three-year-old daughter a place at a heavily oversubscribed local nursery school, which their two older children had attended. The family had in fact done nothing wrong, and the investigation was eventually aborted.

Yesterday it emerged that Poole borough council had legitimately used the Regulation of Investigatory Powers Act to monitor the family. This involved keeping a detailed log of their movements for two weeks, following the mother's car as she took her three children to school each day and even watching the family home to ascertain their sleeping habits.

The Act, passed in 2000, was supposed to allow security agencies to combat terrorism.

The 39-year-old mother, a businesswoman who wished to remain anonymous, said: "I can't imagine a greater invasion of our privacy. I'm incensed that legislation designed to combat terrorism can be turned on a three-year-old. It was very creepy when we found out that people had been watching us and making notes. Councils should be protecting children, not spying on them."

The council defended its right to investigate families in a covert manner, saying it had used the law twice in the past year to successfully prove parents were lying about where they lived.


oracle broadcasting